Plasma 5?

[Shantanu Tushar Jha]

+1

And, its easier to "say" as well :)


On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Marco Martin <notmart at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Monday 05 May 2014, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
>
> > The baseline, to use "Plasma" as the brand, and only refer to the version
> > as a technicality should of course stay the same.
> >
> > Why do I think 5 is better than 2014.6, or <year>.<month of release>?
>
> After trying (with not much success) to use publicly the next/2014.06
> scheme,
> I have to agree that I would feel more confortable with either Plasma 5 or
> Plasma 2
> To me either of which wouldn't make much difference, it's true tough that
> looks less confusing if it has the same number as frameworks and Qt
>
>
> --
> Marco Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Plasma-devel mailing list
> Plasma-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
>



-- 
Shantanu Tushar    (UTC +0530)
http://www.shantanutushar.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20140505/f44ab43d/attachment.html>