Plasma 5?

[Marco Martin]

On Monday 05 May 2014, Sebastian Kügler wrote:

> The baseline, to use "Plasma" as the brand, and only refer to the version
> as a technicality should of course stay the same.
> 
> Why do I think 5 is better than 2014.6, or <year>.<month of release>?

After trying (with not much success) to use publicly the next/2014.06 scheme, 
I have to agree that I would feel more confortable with either Plasma 5 or 
Plasma 2
To me either of which wouldn't make much difference, it's true tough that 
looks less confusing if it has the same number as frameworks and Qt


-- 
Marco Martin