Review Request: Build engineexplorer even if Soprano isn't found
Richard Dale
richard.j.dale at gmail.com
Mon May 5 11:28:45 CEST 2008
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Alex Merry <huntedhacker at tiscali.co.uk>
wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://mattr.info:8080/r/356/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Review request for Plasma.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> At the moment, engineexplorer will not be built if Soprano isn't found.
> Since it's quite a vital tool for Plasma development, this patch makes it
> build, but just without Soprano::Node support.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> trunk/KDE/kdebase/workspace/plasma/tools/CMakeLists.txt
> trunk/KDE/kdebase/workspace/plasma/tools/engineexplorer/CMakeLists.txt
>
> trunk/KDE/kdebase/workspace/plasma/tools/engineexplorer/engineexplorer.cpp
>
> Diff: http://mattr.info:8080/r/356/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Builds with the CMake variable WITH_Soprano set to OFF as well as ON.
>
> #warnings used to check that the expected code was compiled in or out
> depending on the above variable.
>
> It seems a good idea to me, to make it build either way (I did wonder if
> Soprano was mandatory for kdebase). I tried to look at the diff above but
> got an error message.
-- Richard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/panel-devel/attachments/20080505/143afbae/attachment.html
More information about the Panel-devel
mailing list