Review Request: Build engineexplorer even if Soprano isn't found

Alex Merry huntedhacker at tiscali.co.uk
Mon May 5 11:44:07 CEST 2008


On Monday 05 May 2008 10:28:45 Richard Dale wrote:
> > It seems a good idea to me, to make it build either way (I did wonder if
> > Soprano was mandatory for kdebase). I tried to look at the diff above but
> > got an error message.
>
> -- Richard

Yep, review board is a touch broken at the moment.

Patch attached.

Alex


-- 
KDE: http://www.kde.org
Ubuntu/Kubuntu: http://www.ubuntu.org http://www.kubuntu.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/panel-devel/attachments/20080505/2e4ec299/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: plasma-ee-soprano-op.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3045 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/panel-devel/attachments/20080505/2e4ec299/attachment.bin 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/panel-devel/attachments/20080505/2e4ec299/attachment.pgp 


More information about the Panel-devel mailing list