Here we go again

[Jerry Kreps]

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

On 3/1/00, 1:24:41 PM, Martin Piskernig <martin.piskernig at stuwo.at> 
wrote regarding Re: Here we go again:


> On Wed, 01 Mar 2000, you wrote:
> > I installed 1.1, that was a mistake !

I installed 1.1 without a hitch, right on top of the 1.1beta, using 
the SuSE binaries for 6.3.  It compiled my xbase app faultlessly.

> I don't think so, 1.1 is by far the most stable and feature-full 
release ever.

Definitely.  A superb tool!

> > Once again I'm faced with an ancient problem. Namely 'checking for 
Qt...
> > configure: error: Qt- 1.4 (libraries) not found. Please check your
> > installation!  ***failed***'

> This is NOT a problem of KDevelop but of your installation (as the 
text says).
> There are several reasons for this:
> a) You didn't export the QTDIR variable to the right Qt path
> (you will also need a correct KDEDIR later in the ./configure process)
> b) You didn't add the $(QTDIR)/lib to your /etc/ld.so.conf (and 
running
> ldconfig after it) or to the LD_LIBRARY_PATH (you will need 
$(KDEDIR)/lib
> later on, too)
> c) You didn't install the Qt includes (should be package qt-devel or 
similar)
> (and maybe qt-compat)
> d) You overwrote the 1.4 libs with your 2.0 libs, I guess you should 
totally
> uninstall qt-2.0 if you don't need it, because it will surely conflict 
with
> other software as well if you don't know how to setup it in the right 
way.

> > Working with kdevelop has once again become very frustrating !

> You didn't work with it, you didn't even get it to compile - so 
"working with
> kdevelop" can't be "frustrating" yet;  q.e.d.

> PS: Please rethink your writing style ('mistake', 'frustrating' ect. 
in this
> usage are no words which make it easy to others to try to help you!!)
> --
> Martin Piskernig
> <mpiskernig at kdevelop.de>       ICQ: 24015591
> The KDevelop Team           www.kdevelop.org