Test KDevelop4 with --graphicssystem native

Aleix Pol aleixpol at kde.org
Sat Nov 21 21:23:54 UTC 2009


On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Andreas Pakulat <apaku at gmx.de> wrote:

> On 21.11.09 13:42:25, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > a recent bugreport shows that raster engine isn't quite the right choice
> > in all cases (remote X, i.e. ssh -X or XDMCP). Which made me re-check
> > how fast it is nowadays (with Qt4.6) at rendering text. The good news
> > is, its fast enough to type quickly in kate.
> >
> > As this is only 1 system I currently have with Qt4.6, I'd like to gather
> > some feedback from other people running Qt4.6. So please try running
> > kdevelop with --graphicssystem native and work with that. Let me know
> > wether its faster as before or slower (we're using raster on Qt4.5.2 and
> > later).
> >
> > I suggest that if we don't find enough data one way or the other we'll
> > keep what we have now and see how many bugreports we receive during the
> > KDE4.4 phase and re-evaluate based on that for 4.1.
>
> I've done a test on my old HP laptop (its from 2003, 1.4GHz CPU, 1G RAM,
> Intel graphics), with Qt4.5.3 and KDE 4.3.3. There was no noticeable
> difference between raster and native graphicsmode on that machine. In
> fact it was reasonably fast and I could've actually used kdevelop there.
>
> Andreas
>
> --
> It is so very hard to be an
>
> on-your-own-take-care-of-yourself-because-there-is-no-one-else-to-do-it-for-you
> grown-up.
>
> --
> KDevelop-devel mailing list
> KDevelop-devel at kdevelop.org
> https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
>

I've tried it with composite enabled and it's slightly faster with raster.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20091121/c2d0bdee/attachment.html>


More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list