Test KDevelop4 with --graphicssystem native

[Andreas Pakulat]

On 21.11.09 22:23:54, Aleix Pol wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Andreas Pakulat <apaku at gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> > On 21.11.09 13:42:25, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > a recent bugreport shows that raster engine isn't quite the right choice
> > > in all cases (remote X, i.e. ssh -X or XDMCP). Which made me re-check
> > > how fast it is nowadays (with Qt4.6) at rendering text. The good news
> > > is, its fast enough to type quickly in kate.
> > >
> > > As this is only 1 system I currently have with Qt4.6, I'd like to gather
> > > some feedback from other people running Qt4.6. So please try running
> > > kdevelop with --graphicssystem native and work with that. Let me know
> > > wether its faster as before or slower (we're using raster on Qt4.5.2 and
> > > later).
> > >
> > > I suggest that if we don't find enough data one way or the other we'll
> > > keep what we have now and see how many bugreports we receive during the
> > > KDE4.4 phase and re-evaluate based on that for 4.1.
> >
> > I've done a test on my old HP laptop (its from 2003, 1.4GHz CPU, 1G RAM,
> > Intel graphics), with Qt4.5.3 and KDE 4.3.3. There was no noticeable
> > difference between raster and native graphicsmode on that machine. In
> > fact it was reasonably fast and I could've actually used kdevelop there.
> >
> > Andreas
> >
> > --
> > It is so very hard to be an
> >
> > on-your-own-take-care-of-yourself-because-there-is-no-one-else-to-do-it-for-you
> > grown-up.
> 
> I've tried it with composite enabled and it's slightly faster with raster.

Aah, good idea. I can't try with composite on the old laptop, but I'll
try that tomorrow on the new machine. I recall that playing a role to
some extent.

Andreas

-- 
You have taken yourself too seriously.