[Kde-scm-interest] New life in kdesdk-migration-to-git :) (was: Re: Layout of "lokalize" and "kompare" git repos with plugins integrated (was: Re: Forming repos by plugin type or code domain?))

[Sebastian Dörner]

On 15 December 2012 15:12, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau <kossebau at kde.org>wrote:

> Hi Jeremy & all,
>
> thanks for pushing this more forward! I so look forward to have Okteta
> sources
> in git :) and have been sorry we got stuck in summer with the migration.
>
> Am Dienstag, 11. Dezember 2012, 18:03:07 schrieb Jeremy Whiting:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Thanks to some awesome students in Brazil we have most (maybe all) of the
> > kdesdk migration rules written.
>
> Have to report that the Okteta rules are not complete yet, a branch is
> missing
> and the origin of the Okteta lib inside the KHexEdit subtree is missing
> out as
> well. The latter is quite complicate, at least I had failed when I tried to
> write rules in summer. Would be happy to join the students work and see to
> solve it together.
>
> Where can the current rules be found? And could you please pass this email
> forward to Willian A. Mayan who wrote the Okteta rules, so we can get in
> contact?
>
> And a more general question:
>
> I see that last thursday on the wiki page for the migration you turned the
> entry "Decide which repos should be created from which submodules" from "IN
> PROGRESS" to "DONE". Hm. The very email you used to pick up the discussion
> again was still about how the split up should be done, and by that time it
> was
> e.g. decided that the po/ts/xlf strigi-analyzers and the po thumbnailer
> join
> the lokalize repo. So has that and the other pending decisions been
> reverted
> meanwhile? Or did you miss this discussion, because the "Module Splitup"
> section looked like it's done (missing any "Warning, in discussion")?
>
For kompare, we agreed on a layout, and this is implemented now.

As far as I know, no progress has been made about lokalize. The last
relevant email is the one quoted by Jeremy:
http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-sdk-devel/2012-June/000066.html
At the time, I must have missed it, as it's not in my inbox. Currently, I
don't quite know what it's supposed to mean. "I'm for this layout" is
written below the layout of SVN, which is obviously going away. I guess it
means we should keep the analyzers separate?

If so, the lokalize repo should be fine. But then we need to update the
rules for strigi-analyzers, because currently they still contain the
diff-analyzer from Kompare (which is now in the kompare repo). If OTOH we
put the analyzers into lokalize, then the lokalize rules must be updated
for that.

In any case, we still seem to lack a clear decision :(


> This non-straight-forward splitup of kdesdk was effectively what put a
> stop to
> the migration, as the rules became more complicated...
>
> Cheers
> Friedrich
> _______________________________________________
> Kde-scm-interest mailing list
> Kde-scm-interest at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/attachments/20121216/00c1c356/attachment.html>