[Kde-scm-interest] New life in kdesdk-migration-to-git :) (was: Re: Layout of "lokalize" and "kompare" git repos with plugins integrated (was: Re: Forming repos by plugin type or code domain?))

[Friedrich W. H. Kossebau]

Hi Jeremy & all,

thanks for pushing this more forward! I so look forward to have Okteta sources 
in git :) and have been sorry we got stuck in summer with the migration.

Am Dienstag, 11. Dezember 2012, 18:03:07 schrieb Jeremy Whiting:
> Hello all,
> 
> Thanks to some awesome students in Brazil we have most (maybe all) of the
> kdesdk migration rules written.

Have to report that the Okteta rules are not complete yet, a branch is missing 
and the origin of the Okteta lib inside the KHexEdit subtree is missing out as 
well. The latter is quite complicate, at least I had failed when I tried to 
write rules in summer. Would be happy to join the students work and see to 
solve it together.

Where can the current rules be found? And could you please pass this email 
forward to Willian A. Mayan who wrote the Okteta rules, so we can get in 
contact? 

And a more general question:

I see that last thursday on the wiki page for the migration you turned the 
entry "Decide which repos should be created from which submodules" from "IN 
PROGRESS" to "DONE". Hm. The very email you used to pick up the discussion 
again was still about how the split up should be done, and by that time it was 
e.g. decided that the po/ts/xlf strigi-analyzers and the po thumbnailer join 
the lokalize repo. So has that and the other pending decisions been reverted 
meanwhile? Or did you miss this discussion, because the "Module Splitup" 
section looked like it's done (missing any "Warning, in discussion")?

This non-straight-forward splitup of kdesdk was effectively what put a stop to 
the migration, as the rules became more complicated...

Cheers
Friedrich