Shortcut shadowing terminology

[Adrian Chaves]

On the language front, the shadowing is the effective one, the shadowed 
the disabled one. override=shadow, overriding=shadowing=effective, 
overridden=shadowed=disabled.

So, if A is shadowed by B, meaning B shadows A, it means B is in effect.

If that's not what actually happens in code, then I would consider it a 
bug.

On 2023-03-08 00:56, Albert Astals Cid wrote:

> El diumenge, 5 de març de 2023, a les 12:43:22 (CET), Karl Ove 
> Hufthammer va
> escriure:
> 
>> I'm not sure how to translate the following three strings in
>> kdeclarative5.po:
>> 
>> Global Shortcut Shadowing
>> The '%1' key combination is shadowed by following global actions:\n
>> The '%1' key combination shadows following global actions:\n
>> 
>> I think I understand the concept. A keyboard shortcut is defined in 
>> (at
>> least) two places, and one of them is overriden by the other
>> (higher-priority) keyboard shortcut. But I find the terminology
>> confusing. If shortcut A is shadowed by shortcut B, is it A or B that
>> actually has an effect?
> 
> That's a good question and I don't have the answer :D
> 
> Oleg you did that piece of code, do you remember?
> 
> Cheers,
> Albert
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-i18n-doc/attachments/20230309/37b4fe4f/attachment.htm>