Let's get in release mode!
Martin Klapetek
martin.klapetek at gmail.com
Tue Dec 17 10:47:30 UTC 2013
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:39 AM, David Faure <faure at kde.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 December 2013 23:27:39 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > Other than apidox, I was also concerned about frameworkintegration,
> > itemmodels, itemviews and dnssd. The rest of the names are quite
> > descriptive as to what they contain and are fine.
>
> Yeah, itemmodels and itemviews often come up as not descriptive enough,
> but nobody has fixed that. What could we do? kf5itemmodels, kf5itemviews?
>
Fwiw, I'd suggest to remove the "5" from repo name, because when we'll do
kf6 (couple years away, but still..), we'll have to either rename the repos
again or create set of new repos.
Cheers
--
Martin Klapetek | KDE Developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20131217/ffa9b73a/attachment.html>
More information about the Kde-frameworks-devel
mailing list