Let's get in release mode!

[Ben Cooksley]

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Martin Klapetek <martin.klapetek at gmail.com
> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:39 AM, David Faure <faure at kde.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 17 December 2013 23:27:39 Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> > Other than apidox, I was also concerned about frameworkintegration,
>> > itemmodels, itemviews and dnssd. The rest of the names are quite
>> > descriptive as to what they contain and are fine.
>>
>> Yeah, itemmodels and itemviews often come up as not descriptive enough,
>> but nobody has fixed that. What could we do? kf5itemmodels, kf5itemviews?
>>
>
> Fwiw, I'd suggest to remove the "5" from repo name, because when we'll do
> kf6 (couple years away, but still..), we'll have to either rename the repos
> again or create set of new repos.
>

I have now re-split kdelibs, updated repositories can be found in the usual
place.
One new conflict did come up - kdnssd is already taken, so it was called
kdnssd-framework instead.



>
> Cheers
> --
> Martin Klapetek | KDE Developer
>

Thanks,
Ben


>
> _______________________________________________
> Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
> Kde-frameworks-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20131218/398c3796/attachment.html>