Flatpak Manifest Licensing

Johnny Jazeix jazeix at gmail.com
Fri May 19 08:06:08 BST 2023

Le ven. 19 mai 2023 à 02:27, Justin Zobel <justin.zobel at gmail.com> a écrit :

> Hey Everyone,
> As Binary Factory is to be shut down soon we are moving the Flatpak
> manifests to their individual GitLab repositories.
> Most of this is fairly simple, however, some GitLab repositories have
> enabled reuse linting (which is great). The Flatpak manifests I have
> come across so far have not had any licensing information included. This
> email is just to start a discussion about what everyone's thoughts are
> about which license to apply for them.
> The GitLab CI files are licensed as CC0-1.0 and I'm thinking that this
> might be a suitable license as the Flatpak manifest files are simply
> text files.
> # SPDX-FileCopyrightText: None
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: CC0-1.0
> Let me know your thoughts.
> Justin


is this on what Neelaksh worked during SoK? For GCompris, he added it with
CopyrightText: None and CC0-1.0 like you say and it's fine with us:

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-devel/attachments/20230519/a85b164d/attachment.htm>

More information about the kde-devel mailing list