Flatpak Manifest Licensing

[Volker Krause]

On Freitag, 19. Mai 2023 02:26:37 CEST Justin Zobel wrote:
> Hey Everyone,
> 
> As Binary Factory is to be shut down soon we are moving the Flatpak
> manifests to their individual GitLab repositories.
> 
> Most of this is fairly simple, however, some GitLab repositories have
> enabled reuse linting (which is great). The Flatpak manifests I have
> come across so far have not had any licensing information included. This
> email is just to start a discussion about what everyone's thoughts are
> about which license to apply for them.
> 
> The GitLab CI files are licensed as CC0-1.0 and I'm thinking that this
> might be a suitable license as the Flatpak manifest files are simply
> text files.
> # SPDX-FileCopyrightText: None
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: CC0-1.0

We can make license recommendations, but especially for the existing ones I'd 
say this is something their respective authors need to decide/agree to, we 
can't just pick whatever we like if there is no license information.

Regards,
Volker
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-devel/attachments/20230519/c8b31584/attachment.sig>