CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)
steveire at gmail.com
Mon Dec 30 10:29:48 GMT 2019
On 30/12/2019 08:55, Dominik Haumann wrote:
> Stephen Kelly <steveire at gmail.com <mailto:steveire at gmail.com>> schrieb
> am So., 29. Dez. 2019, 15:03:
> On 28/12/2019 23:30, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> > Why are you proposing to do a step back instead to the old
> state, which
> > everyone including you considered not that satisfying?
> Because it's a temporary situation. We still have a way forward in
> (which will open in a few months).
> Generally, getting Grantlee into KF5 now also establishes the wrong
> precedent. Grantlee should be split into two repos each with a tier 1
> library (KF6::TextDocument and KF6::TextTemplate). The two are
> independent and have nothing to do with each other aside from
> authorship. That seems to be something you were objecting to, so I
> to make sure that's something addressed on its own. The two KF6
> libraries will then follow the KF6 naming conventions etc.
> With my KTextEditor hat on: KF6:TextDocument implies somehow a link to
> QTextDocument or KF6:TextEditor, which both is incorrect, right?
QTextDocument is exactly what it's about, which makes the name
KF6::TextDocument fully appropriate and correct.
> Before starting this work, let's clarify whether we can find a more
> unique name (like KF6:GrantleeTextDocument).
The name I suggest is already correct.
> Since I haven't used Grantlee yet, I sm likely not the best person to
> find a better name ;)
Remember, Grantlee is a set of Frameworks (*Just like KF5/6*) which
happens to contain just TWO independent libraries.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the kde-core-devel