Moving Baloo forward

[Ivan Čukić]

Well, the 'worst case' is actually the real case.

But, the thing is that it will be actively tested and developed simply
because we will have both filesystems with xattr (home etc.), and without
(vfat usb-s, encfs stuff and similar).

So, both are used at the same time, and regressions will be noticed and
fixed immediately.

This situation is not the same as doubling the code-paths due to
hal/u*stuff/whatever else, x11/wayland etc. where you tend to use only one
technology, and not the other.

Ch!


On 24 January 2014 12:39, Sebastian Kügler <sebas at kde.org> wrote:

> On Friday, January 24, 2014 01:24:54 Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> > in the best case you'll have two totally different codepaths
> > that you'll have to manage.
>
> This should be "worst case", I think. In the best case, there's xattr
> support,
> meaning another code path isn't needed.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> sebas
>
> http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
>



-- 
Cheerio,
Ivan

--
While you were hanging yourself on someone else's words
Dying to believe in what you heard
I was staring straight into the shining sun
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20140124/c9e37b74/attachment.htm>