[Digikam-users] digikam slow when opening an album

[Gilles Caulier]

did you store DB files on removable USB drive or in local computer ?

Which Exiv2 version you use ? Go to Help/Components Info for details.

Did you use multicore option in Maintenance tool ? If you turn off this
option, this improve the speed?

Gilles Caulier

2015-10-05 17:43 GMT+02:00 Luca Ferrari <fluca1978 at infinito.it>:

> I'm also getting now a lot of:
>
> digikam(11191)/digikam (core) Digikam::DMetadata::getIccProfile: Exif
> color-space tag is sRGB. Using default sRGB ICC profile.
> digikam(11191)/digikam (core) Digikam::DMetadata::getIccProfile: Exif
> color-space tag is sRGB. Using default sRGB ICC profile.
> digikam(11191)/digikam (core) Digikam::DMetadata::getIccProfile: Exif
> color-space tag is sRGB. Using default sRGB ICC profile.
> digikam(11191)/digikam (core) Digikam::DMetadata::getIccProfile: Exif
> color-space tag is sRGB. Using default sRGB ICC profile.
> digikam(11191)/digikam (core) Digikam::DMetadata::getIccProfile: Exif
> color-space tag is sRGB. Using default sRGB ICC profile.
> digikam(11191)/digikam (core) Digikam::DMetadata::getIccProfile: Exif
> color-space tag is sRGB. Using default sRGB ICC profile.
> digikam(11191)/digikam (core) Digikam::DMetadata::getIccProfile: Exif
> color-space tag is sRGB. Using default sRGB ICC profile.
> digikam(11191)/digikam (core) Digikam::DMetadata::getIccProfile: Exif
> color-space tag is sRGB. Using default sRGB ICC profile.
> digikam(11191)/digikam (core) Digikam::DMetadata::getIccProfile: Exif
> color-space tag is sRGB. Using default sRGB ICC profile.
> digikam(11191)/digikam (core) Digikam::DMetadata::getIccProfile: Exif
> color-space tag is sRGB. Using default sRGB ICC profile.
> digikam(11191)/digikam (core) Digikam::DMetadata::getIccProfile: Exif
> color-space tag is sRGB. Using default sRGB ICC profile.
>
> for each image, and each image is now processed at a speed of 10 secs
> (size of image is around 5 MB).
> So far I'm stuck: after 3+ hours I'm still at 2% of the process,
> meaning it will going on for days before it ends. I'm recovering the
> old thumbnail database (that could be corrupt) and try to rebuild some
> parts of it.
>
> Any suggestion is welcome.
>
> Thanks,
> Luca
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Luca Ferrari <fluca1978 at infinito.it>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> yes. Follow instructions into "For hangs out or dysfunctions" section
> from :
> >>
> >> https://www.digikam.org/contrib
> >
> > Thanks, at least I'm seeing that the process is runnig. So far, after
> > 30 mins it is still at 0% and the console reports a line every 30
> > seconds:
> >
> > digikam(10312)/digikam (core) Digikam::DImg::load:
> > "/media/luca/Marco_A_0014.jpg"  : JPEG file identified
> > digikam(10312)/digikam (core) Digikam::DImg::load:
> > "/media/luca/Marco_A_0015.jpg"  : JPEG file identified
> >
> > Such images are around 50 MB each.
> >
> > The preamble before the process starts is:
> >
> >
> > digikam(10312)/digikam (core) Digikam::MaintenanceMngr::setSettings:
> > wholeAlbums         : true
> > wholeTags           : false
> > Albums              : 1124
> > Tags                : 0
> > useMutiCoreCPU      : true
> > newItems            : false
> > thumbnails          : true
> > scanThumbs          : false
> > fingerPrints        : false
> > scanFingerPrints    : true
> > duplicates          : false
> > similarity          : 90
> > faceManagement      : false
> > faceScannedHandling : 0
> > qualitySort         : false
> > quality             :
> > EnableSorter      : false
> > DetectBlur        : true
> > DetectNoise       : true
> > DetectCompression : true
> > DetectOverexposure :true
> > LowQRejected      : true
> > MediumQPending    : true
> > HighQAccepted     : true
> > Speed             : 1
> > Rejected Threshold: 10
> > Pending Threshold : 40
> > Accepted Threshold: 60
> > Blur Weight       : 100
> > Noise Weight      : 100
> > Compression Weight: 100
> >
> > qualityScanMode     : 0
> > metadataSync        : false
> > syncDirection       : 0
> >
> > digikam(10312)/digikam (core) Digikam::MaintenanceMngr::stage1: stage1
> > digikam(10312)/digikam (core) Digikam::MaintenanceMngr::stage2: stage2
> >
> >
> > I'll leave the process go and see if it hungs somewhere.
> > Is there a way to instrument digikam to produce faster/low quality
> > thumbnails for larger images?
> >
> > Luca
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20151005/167851e1/attachment.html>