[Digikam-users] digikam slow when opening an album

[Luca Ferrari]

I'm also getting now a lot of:

digikam(11191)/digikam (core) Digikam::DMetadata::getIccProfile: Exif
color-space tag is sRGB. Using default sRGB ICC profile.
digikam(11191)/digikam (core) Digikam::DMetadata::getIccProfile: Exif
color-space tag is sRGB. Using default sRGB ICC profile.
digikam(11191)/digikam (core) Digikam::DMetadata::getIccProfile: Exif
color-space tag is sRGB. Using default sRGB ICC profile.
digikam(11191)/digikam (core) Digikam::DMetadata::getIccProfile: Exif
color-space tag is sRGB. Using default sRGB ICC profile.
digikam(11191)/digikam (core) Digikam::DMetadata::getIccProfile: Exif
color-space tag is sRGB. Using default sRGB ICC profile.
digikam(11191)/digikam (core) Digikam::DMetadata::getIccProfile: Exif
color-space tag is sRGB. Using default sRGB ICC profile.
digikam(11191)/digikam (core) Digikam::DMetadata::getIccProfile: Exif
color-space tag is sRGB. Using default sRGB ICC profile.
digikam(11191)/digikam (core) Digikam::DMetadata::getIccProfile: Exif
color-space tag is sRGB. Using default sRGB ICC profile.
digikam(11191)/digikam (core) Digikam::DMetadata::getIccProfile: Exif
color-space tag is sRGB. Using default sRGB ICC profile.
digikam(11191)/digikam (core) Digikam::DMetadata::getIccProfile: Exif
color-space tag is sRGB. Using default sRGB ICC profile.
digikam(11191)/digikam (core) Digikam::DMetadata::getIccProfile: Exif
color-space tag is sRGB. Using default sRGB ICC profile.

for each image, and each image is now processed at a speed of 10 secs
(size of image is around 5 MB).
So far I'm stuck: after 3+ hours I'm still at 2% of the process,
meaning it will going on for days before it ends. I'm recovering the
old thumbnail database (that could be corrupt) and try to rebuild some
parts of it.

Any suggestion is welcome.

Thanks,
Luca

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Luca Ferrari <fluca1978 at infinito.it> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com> wrote:
>> yes. Follow instructions into "For hangs out or dysfunctions" section from :
>>
>> https://www.digikam.org/contrib
>
> Thanks, at least I'm seeing that the process is runnig. So far, after
> 30 mins it is still at 0% and the console reports a line every 30
> seconds:
>
> digikam(10312)/digikam (core) Digikam::DImg::load:
> "/media/luca/Marco_A_0014.jpg"  : JPEG file identified
> digikam(10312)/digikam (core) Digikam::DImg::load:
> "/media/luca/Marco_A_0015.jpg"  : JPEG file identified
>
> Such images are around 50 MB each.
>
> The preamble before the process starts is:
>
>
> digikam(10312)/digikam (core) Digikam::MaintenanceMngr::setSettings:
> wholeAlbums         : true
> wholeTags           : false
> Albums              : 1124
> Tags                : 0
> useMutiCoreCPU      : true
> newItems            : false
> thumbnails          : true
> scanThumbs          : false
> fingerPrints        : false
> scanFingerPrints    : true
> duplicates          : false
> similarity          : 90
> faceManagement      : false
> faceScannedHandling : 0
> qualitySort         : false
> quality             :
> EnableSorter      : false
> DetectBlur        : true
> DetectNoise       : true
> DetectCompression : true
> DetectOverexposure :true
> LowQRejected      : true
> MediumQPending    : true
> HighQAccepted     : true
> Speed             : 1
> Rejected Threshold: 10
> Pending Threshold : 40
> Accepted Threshold: 60
> Blur Weight       : 100
> Noise Weight      : 100
> Compression Weight: 100
>
> qualityScanMode     : 0
> metadataSync        : false
> syncDirection       : 0
>
> digikam(10312)/digikam (core) Digikam::MaintenanceMngr::stage1: stage1
> digikam(10312)/digikam (core) Digikam::MaintenanceMngr::stage2: stage2
>
>
> I'll leave the process go and see if it hungs somewhere.
> Is there a way to instrument digikam to produce faster/low quality
> thumbnails for larger images?
>
> Luca