[Digikam-users] debian testing support

Wed Jun 24 17:11:49 BST 2015

This license have been removed since a while into SVG files :

https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdegraphics/libs/libkipi/repository/revisions/262bbedda81ace4c7fb0930b71c5470fad9ae02d

Again, before to open files in bugzilla, Debian team must check before to
generate noise...

Remember : opensource time is precious. We don't need to waste time with
license details, especially when are wrong or obsolete (:=)))

Just my 10cts€ viewpoint...

Gilles Caulier

2015-06-24 17:17 GMT+02:00 Richard Mortimer <richm+digikam at oldelvet.org.uk>:

> On 24/06/2015 13:38, Alan Pater wrote:
> > Looks like a bogus bug report then. I don't see any license in the svg
> > files either. In fact, they inherit the GPL license from libkipi.
> >
> It does look like the files in the Debian sources do have a license in
> them that specifically prohibits Commercial Use. That has been removed
> from the KDE git as of last December.
>
> See
>
>
> https://sources.debian.net/src/digikam/4:4.4.0-1.1/extra/libkipi/pics/kipi-icon.svg/
>
> lines 54 and 58
>
> rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/" />
>
> lines 67 & 68
>
> <cc:prohibits
> rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/CommercialUse" />
>
> Similar at
>
> https://sources.debian.net/src/digikam/4:4.4.0-1.1/extra/libkipi/pics/kipi-logo.svg/
>
> Looking at the KDE libkipi git repo it looks like Jonathan Riddell
> removed the incorrect cc licence data 7 months ago.
>
>
> https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdegraphics/libs/libkipi/repository/revisions/master/show/pics
>
> 262bbedd        2014-12-03 04:21 pm     Jonathan Riddell
> use inkscape to remove incorrect cc licence data
>
> Regards
>
> Richard
>
> > The bug report appears to have been generated automatically by
> > lintian. I looks to me that it is up to the debian package maintainer
> > to put in the override talked about.
> >
> > I don't think this is anything to worry about. It's normal and obscure
> > Debian packaging workflow.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Gilles Caulier
> > <caulier.gilles at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> But there is no kind of licence in these SVG files. there are Creative
> >> Commons as well without any restriction.
> >>
> >> Debian is really too complicated for me (:-)))...
> >>
> >> Gilles
> >>
> >> 2015-06-24 13:39 GMT+02:00 Alan Pater <alan.pater at gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>> cc-by-nc-sa is: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
> >>>
> >>> The Non-Commercial part is the issue. It needs to be changed to
> CC-BY-SA:
> >>> Attribution Share-Alike
> >>>
> >>> The licenses that meet Debian Free Software Guidelines are listed here:
> >>> https://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 3:04 AM, Simon Frei <freisim93 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> You have a point...
> >>>> I don't get what exactly you are supposed to do marking it as a false
> >>>> positive, maybe just ask on the bug for more specific information?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 24/06/15 09:53, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> The SVG licence is written automatically in XML data by Inkscape. That
> >>>> all
> >>>>
> >>>> It's Creative Commons by default. We don't check it at creation time.
> >>>>
> >>>> In all case, i don't see any licensing violation here.
> >>>>
> >>>> Sometime, i think Debian team have really a lots of time to lost...
> >>>>
> >>>> Gilles Caulier
> >>>>
> >>>> 2015-06-24 9:50 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is ridiculous. we have done this SVG icon in opensource.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Where is the licence agreement about this file ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Gilles Caulier
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2015-06-24 9:45 GMT+02:00 Simon Frei <freisim93 at gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Have a look at the debian package tracker:
> >>>>>> https://packages.qa.debian.org/d/digikam.html
> >>>>>> The specific bug in question is: https://bugs.debian.org/787349
> >>>>>> It states that "extra/libkipi/pics/kipi-*.svg" is declared as
> >>>>>> cc-by-nc-sa on source. They suggest to remove libkipi and instead
> >>>>>> build-depend on the package libkipi.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 24/06/15 09:39, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2015-06-24 9:34 GMT+02:00 Simon Frei <freisim93 at gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Since jessie freeze there has been no development in the digikam
> >>>>>>> packages for debian. Now there has come up a RC bug about some non
> free
> >>>>>>> kipi-plugin component which will remove digikam from testing on
> the 26 June.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Non free kipi-plugins ? Which one. All is GPL !
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Gilles Caulier
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
> >>>>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
> >>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
> >>>>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
> >>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Digikam-users mailing list
> >>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
> >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Digikam-users mailing list
> >>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
> >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Digikam-users mailing list
> >>> Digikam-users at kde.org
> >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Digikam-users mailing list
> >> Digikam-users at kde.org
> >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Digikam-users mailing list
> > Digikam-users at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20150624/eaee3fe2/attachment.html>