<div dir="ltr">This license have been removed since a while into SVG files :<div><br></div><div><a href="https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdegraphics/libs/libkipi/repository/revisions/262bbedda81ace4c7fb0930b71c5470fad9ae02d">https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdegraphics/libs/libkipi/repository/revisions/262bbedda81ace4c7fb0930b71c5470fad9ae02d</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>Again, before to open files in bugzilla, Debian team must check before to generate noise...</div><div><br></div><div>Remember : opensource time is precious. We don't need to waste time with license details, especially when are wrong or obsolete (:=)))</div><div><br></div><div>Just my 10cts€ viewpoint...</div><div><br></div><div>Gilles Caulier</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-06-24 17:17 GMT+02:00 Richard Mortimer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:richm+digikam@oldelvet.org.uk" target="_blank">richm+digikam@oldelvet.org.uk</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 24/06/2015 13:38, Alan Pater wrote:<br>
> Looks like a bogus bug report then. I don't see any license in the svg<br>
> files either. In fact, they inherit the GPL license from libkipi.<br>
><br>
</span>It does look like the files in the Debian sources do have a license in<br>
them that specifically prohibits Commercial Use. That has been removed<br>
from the KDE git as of last December.<br>
<br>
See<br>
<br>
<a href="https://sources.debian.net/src/digikam/4:4.4.0-1.1/extra/libkipi/pics/kipi-icon.svg/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://sources.debian.net/src/digikam/4:4.4.0-1.1/extra/libkipi/pics/kipi-icon.svg/</a><br>
<br>
lines 54 and 58<br>
<br>
rdf:resource="<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/</a>" /><br>
<br>
lines 67 & 68<br>
<br>
<cc:prohibits<br>
rdf:resource="<a href="http://web.resource.org/cc/CommercialUse" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://web.resource.org/cc/CommercialUse</a>" /><br>
<br>
Similar at<br>
<a href="https://sources.debian.net/src/digikam/4:4.4.0-1.1/extra/libkipi/pics/kipi-logo.svg/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://sources.debian.net/src/digikam/4:4.4.0-1.1/extra/libkipi/pics/kipi-logo.svg/</a><br>
<br>
Looking at the KDE libkipi git repo it looks like Jonathan Riddell<br>
removed the incorrect cc licence data 7 months ago.<br>
<br>
<a href="https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdegraphics/libs/libkipi/repository/revisions/master/show/pics" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdegraphics/libs/libkipi/repository/revisions/master/show/pics</a><br>
<br>
262bbedd 2014-12-03 04:21 pm Jonathan Riddell<br>
use inkscape to remove incorrect cc licence data<br>
<br>
Regards<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Richard<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
> The bug report appears to have been generated automatically by<br>
> lintian. I looks to me that it is up to the debian package maintainer<br>
> to put in the override talked about.<br>
><br>
> I don't think this is anything to worry about. It's normal and obscure<br>
> Debian packaging workflow.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Gilles Caulier<br>
> <<a href="mailto:caulier.gilles@gmail.com">caulier.gilles@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> But there is no kind of licence in these SVG files. there are Creative<br>
>> Commons as well without any restriction.<br>
>><br>
>> Debian is really too complicated for me (:-)))...<br>
>><br>
>> Gilles<br>
>><br>
>> 2015-06-24 13:39 GMT+02:00 Alan Pater <<a href="mailto:alan.pater@gmail.com">alan.pater@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
>>><br>
>>> cc-by-nc-sa is: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike<br>
>>><br>
>>> The Non-Commercial part is the issue. It needs to be changed to CC-BY-SA:<br>
>>> Attribution Share-Alike<br>
>>><br>
>>> The licenses that meet Debian Free Software Guidelines are listed here:<br>
>>> <a href="https://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses</a><br>
>>><br>
>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 3:04 AM, Simon Frei <<a href="mailto:freisim93@gmail.com">freisim93@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> You have a point...<br>
>>>> I don't get what exactly you are supposed to do marking it as a false<br>
>>>> positive, maybe just ask on the bug for more specific information?<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> On 24/06/15 09:53, Gilles Caulier wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> The SVG licence is written automatically in XML data by Inkscape. That<br>
>>>> all<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> It's Creative Commons by default. We don't check it at creation time.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> In all case, i don't see any licensing violation here.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Sometime, i think Debian team have really a lots of time to lost...<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Gilles Caulier<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> 2015-06-24 9:50 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <<a href="mailto:caulier.gilles@gmail.com">caulier.gilles@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> This is ridiculous. we have done this SVG icon in opensource.<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Where is the licence agreement about this file ?<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Gilles Caulier<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> 2015-06-24 9:45 GMT+02:00 Simon Frei <<a href="mailto:freisim93@gmail.com">freisim93@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> Have a look at the debian package tracker:<br>
>>>>>> <a href="https://packages.qa.debian.org/d/digikam.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://packages.qa.debian.org/d/digikam.html</a><br>
>>>>>> The specific bug in question is: <a href="https://bugs.debian.org/787349" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugs.debian.org/787349</a><br>
>>>>>> It states that "extra/libkipi/pics/kipi-*.svg" is declared as<br>
>>>>>> cc-by-nc-sa on source. They suggest to remove libkipi and instead<br>
>>>>>> build-depend on the package libkipi.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> On 24/06/15 09:39, Gilles Caulier wrote:<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> 2015-06-24 9:34 GMT+02:00 Simon Frei <<a href="mailto:freisim93@gmail.com">freisim93@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> Hi,<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> Since jessie freeze there has been no development in the digikam<br>
>>>>>>> packages for debian. Now there has come up a RC bug about some non free<br>
>>>>>>> kipi-plugin component which will remove digikam from testing on the 26 June.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> Non free kipi-plugins ? Which one. All is GPL !<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> Gilles Caulier<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list<br>
>>>>>> <a href="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org">Digikam-users@kde.org</a><br>
>>>>>> <a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users</a><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list<br>
>>>>>> <a href="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org">Digikam-users@kde.org</a><br>
>>>>>> <a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users</a><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>>> Digikam-users mailing list<br>
>>>> <a href="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org">Digikam-users@kde.org</a><br>
>>>> <a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users</a><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>>> Digikam-users mailing list<br>
>>>> <a href="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org">Digikam-users@kde.org</a><br>
>>>> <a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users</a><br>
>>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>> Digikam-users mailing list<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org">Digikam-users@kde.org</a><br>
>>> <a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users</a><br>
>>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Digikam-users mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org">Digikam-users@kde.org</a><br>
>> <a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users</a><br>
>><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Digikam-users mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org">Digikam-users@kde.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users</a><br>
><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Digikam-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Digikam-users@kde.org">Digikam-users@kde.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>