[Digikam-users] debian testing support

[Richard Mortimer]

On 24/06/2015 13:38, Alan Pater wrote:
> Looks like a bogus bug report then. I don't see any license in the svg
> files either. In fact, they inherit the GPL license from libkipi.
> 
It does look like the files in the Debian sources do have a license in
them that specifically prohibits Commercial Use. That has been removed
from the KDE git as of last December.

See

https://sources.debian.net/src/digikam/4:4.4.0-1.1/extra/libkipi/pics/kipi-icon.svg/

lines 54 and 58

rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/" />

lines 67 & 68

<cc:prohibits
rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/CommercialUse" />

Similar at
https://sources.debian.net/src/digikam/4:4.4.0-1.1/extra/libkipi/pics/kipi-logo.svg/

Looking at the KDE libkipi git repo it looks like Jonathan Riddell
removed the incorrect cc licence data 7 months ago.

https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdegraphics/libs/libkipi/repository/revisions/master/show/pics

262bbedd 	2014-12-03 04:21 pm 	Jonathan Riddell 	
use inkscape to remove incorrect cc licence data

Regards

Richard

> The bug report appears to have been generated automatically by
> lintian. I looks to me that it is up to the debian package maintainer
> to put in the override talked about.
> 
> I don't think this is anything to worry about. It's normal and obscure
> Debian packaging workflow.
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Gilles Caulier
> <caulier.gilles at gmail.com> wrote:
>> But there is no kind of licence in these SVG files. there are Creative
>> Commons as well without any restriction.
>>
>> Debian is really too complicated for me (:-)))...
>>
>> Gilles
>>
>> 2015-06-24 13:39 GMT+02:00 Alan Pater <alan.pater at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> cc-by-nc-sa is: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
>>>
>>> The Non-Commercial part is the issue. It needs to be changed to CC-BY-SA:
>>> Attribution Share-Alike
>>>
>>> The licenses that meet Debian Free Software Guidelines are listed here:
>>> https://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 3:04 AM, Simon Frei <freisim93 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You have a point...
>>>> I don't get what exactly you are supposed to do marking it as a false
>>>> positive, maybe just ask on the bug for more specific information?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 24/06/15 09:53, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The SVG licence is written automatically in XML data by Inkscape. That
>>>> all
>>>>
>>>> It's Creative Commons by default. We don't check it at creation time.
>>>>
>>>> In all case, i don't see any licensing violation here.
>>>>
>>>> Sometime, i think Debian team have really a lots of time to lost...
>>>>
>>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>>
>>>> 2015-06-24 9:50 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> This is ridiculous. we have done this SVG icon in opensource.
>>>>>
>>>>> Where is the licence agreement about this file ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>>>
>>>>> 2015-06-24 9:45 GMT+02:00 Simon Frei <freisim93 at gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have a look at the debian package tracker:
>>>>>> https://packages.qa.debian.org/d/digikam.html
>>>>>> The specific bug in question is: https://bugs.debian.org/787349
>>>>>> It states that "extra/libkipi/pics/kipi-*.svg" is declared as
>>>>>> cc-by-nc-sa on source. They suggest to remove libkipi and instead
>>>>>> build-depend on the package libkipi.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 24/06/15 09:39, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2015-06-24 9:34 GMT+02:00 Simon Frei <freisim93 at gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since jessie freeze there has been no development in the digikam
>>>>>>> packages for debian. Now there has come up a RC bug about some non free
>>>>>>> kipi-plugin component which will remove digikam from testing on the 26 June.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Non free kipi-plugins ? Which one. All is GPL !
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>