falolaf at gmail.com
Sat May 24 10:02:31 BST 2014
For me it seems that it only happens on images I have resized before
sharpening! Images with original size seem to behave, almost, as in 3.5.0.
(I now have 4.0.0 in parallel and use a fresh configuration.)
2014-05-24 10:49 GMT+02:00 Anders Lund <anders at alweb.dk>:
> Hi Gilles,
> I believe you, it just does not look anything like that here.
> I will try 4.1 when released, and hope for the best, as I can not easily
> both versions installed.
> I was looking much forward to 4.0, with all the wonderful optimizations and
> new features, and I still do!
> One thing I noticed is that I did not have previews in the download window,
> which was a small regress compared to 3.5, but otherwise, 4.0 looked
> until I tried to use the image editor.
> On Lørdag den 24. maj 2014 06:10:29, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> > 2014-05-23 22:44 GMT+02:00 Anders Lund <anders at alweb.dk>:
> > > Hi Gilles,
> > >
> > > After converting from RAW, I try to make adjustments.
> > >
> > > The preview images have a diffetent size than the "before" image, I use
> > > mouse over switch.
> > I use it too here. Look screenshot taken here, with 100% zoom. I
> > raised up sharp effect to see effect applied to image (with noise
> > rejected of course). It's a 16 bits color depth RAW file processed on
> > my double WQHD screens
> > https://www.flickr.com/photos/digikam/14255714125/
> > > After using sharpen, the image I can see is awful - looks like a 100 px
> > > blown up to my 1600px screen. I have not been able in the short time I
> > > tried, to see a good looking image after the sharpening, so I see the
> > > function as broken. It may be that it works in the image file, but I
> > > to be able to review my changes...
> > Sharpen tool can be simple sharp, unsharped mask, or refocus. Which
> > one do you use ?
> > Note : i never seen this dysfunction here. I already seen a
> > dysynchronization between before and after preview, in 5% use cases. I
> > don't yet found where is the problem.
> > > These two things alone is enough that I decided to go back to 3.5,
> > > I could not get on with my task - processing images. With 3.5, I can.
> > >
> > > It does not help that it works for some, so if there are things I can
> > > to
> > > help identify the bugs, let me know.
> > Share with me RAW file to try to reproduce the problem here...
> > Gilles Caulier
> > _______________________________________________
> > Digikam-users mailing list
> > Digikam-users at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Digikam-users