Amarok v2.8.1

[Dan Meltzer]

I think that what's currently in git has been tested enough (with the
exception of the stuff I've just dumped it--hopefully non-invasive though)
that pushing a 2.8.1 to make Amarok functional everywhere, and then
starting in on some of the waitlisted features for 2.9 could be good.  I'm
going to try and get mac stuff working in a separate branch today, and then
ask for some testing/review of the cmake changes before pushing it.  If it
works for everyone on other platforms, we can think about pushing it for
2.8.1, otherwise I wouldn't mind holding off until 2.9... it's not like
there are a lot of people waiting eagerly to use Amarok on Mac.

Dan,


On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Myriam Schweingruber <myriam at kde.org> wrote:

> Hi all and welcome back to Dan and Matěj :)
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Matěj Laitl <matej at laitl.cz> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Dan Meltzer
> > <parallelgrapefruit at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Everyone,
> ...
> > I've also started poking with the my MTP collection rewrite, which
> > would hopefully be in a releasable state in a month or two. If this
> > goes according to the plan, we may even think of calling it just
> > Amarok 2.9.
>
> I think there are the minor fixes we planed a while back that should
> go out as 2.8.1 ASAP, as we already missed the Kubuntu Trusty release
> due to that delay, and there are some real nasty bugs that make Amarok
> painful to use with 2.8.0. This would also give us more polishing time
> for 2.9
>
> One of the most annoying things is the GUI being not responsive after
> the start due to some collection scanning, I get reports about this
> almost daily
>
> > BTW, it would be nice if Tatjana's AudioCD rewrite would be readied
> > before 2.9 as it would allow us to remove a deprecated framework.
> > Tatjana? Edward?
>
> Wasn't that merged already?
>
>
> Regards, Myriam
>
> --
> Proud member of the Amarok and KDE Community
> Protect your freedom and join the Fellowship of FSFE:
> http://www.fsfe.org
> Please don't send me proprietary file formats,
> use ISO standard ODF instead (ISO/IEC 26300)
> Wasn'
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok-devel mailing list
> Amarok-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20140509/48e41295/attachment.html>