<div dir="ltr"><div>I think that what's currently in git has been tested enough (with the exception of the stuff I've just dumped it--hopefully non-invasive though) that pushing a 2.8.1 to make Amarok functional everywhere, and then starting in on some of the waitlisted features for 2.9 could be good. I'm going to try and get mac stuff working in a separate branch today, and then ask for some testing/review of the cmake changes before pushing it. If it works for everyone on other platforms, we can think about pushing it for 2.8.1, otherwise I wouldn't mind holding off until 2.9... it's not like there are a lot of people waiting eagerly to use Amarok on Mac.<br>
<br></div>Dan,<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Myriam Schweingruber <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:myriam@kde.org" target="_blank">myriam@kde.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi all and welcome back to Dan and Matěj :)<br>
<div class=""><br>
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Matěj Laitl <<a href="mailto:matej@laitl.cz">matej@laitl.cz</a>> wrote:<br>
> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Dan Meltzer<br>
> <<a href="mailto:parallelgrapefruit@gmail.com">parallelgrapefruit@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> Hi Everyone,<br>
</div>...<br>
<div class="">> I've also started poking with the my MTP collection rewrite, which<br>
> would hopefully be in a releasable state in a month or two. If this<br>
> goes according to the plan, we may even think of calling it just<br>
> Amarok 2.9.<br>
<br>
</div>I think there are the minor fixes we planed a while back that should<br>
go out as 2.8.1 ASAP, as we already missed the Kubuntu Trusty release<br>
due to that delay, and there are some real nasty bugs that make Amarok<br>
painful to use with 2.8.0. This would also give us more polishing time<br>
for 2.9<br>
<br>
One of the most annoying things is the GUI being not responsive after<br>
the start due to some collection scanning, I get reports about this<br>
almost daily<br>
<div class=""><br>
> BTW, it would be nice if Tatjana's AudioCD rewrite would be readied<br>
> before 2.9 as it would allow us to remove a deprecated framework.<br>
> Tatjana? Edward?<br>
<br>
</div>Wasn't that merged already?<br>
<br>
<br>
Regards, Myriam<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Proud member of the Amarok and KDE Community<br>
Protect your freedom and join the Fellowship of FSFE:<br>
<a href="http://www.fsfe.org" target="_blank">http://www.fsfe.org</a><br>
Please don't send me proprietary file formats,<br>
use ISO standard ODF instead (ISO/IEC 26300)<br>
Wasn'<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Amarok-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Amarok-devel@kde.org">Amarok-devel@kde.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>