ditching our requirement on the multimedia directory

[Bart Cerneels]

Would this break the kdesvn-build script (http://kdesvn-build.kde.org/) ?
A lot of ppl are using that and might want it to build Amarok to.

2007/3/15, Dan Meltzer <parallelgrapefruit at gmail.com>:
>
> Hey,
>
> Its come up a few times that it would be cool if we didn't have to
> depend on the multimedia directory to build Amarok.  People always
> forget to update it/the cmake subdirectory, and there really isn't
> much need of using it.  I've moved all of our cmake modules to
> amarok/cmake/modules as a start, but I'd like opinions before possibly
> changing amarok to build without the multimedia directory.  It is an
> either/or thing.  We either build from multimedia/ or we don't, as far
> as I can tell there is no way to support both (we set
> INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES relative to the source path... so they have
> amarok/ in the path.. )
>
> So are there reasons to keep it building from the multimedia directory
> or should we change it?
>
> Dan,
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok-devel mailing list
> Amarok-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20070315/e3cd6b01/attachment.html