Would this break the kdesvn-build script (<a href="http://kdesvn-build.kde.org/">http://kdesvn-build.kde.org/</a>) ?<br>A lot of ppl are using that and might want it to build Amarok to.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">
2007/3/15, Dan Meltzer <<a href="mailto:parallelgrapefruit@gmail.com">parallelgrapefruit@gmail.com</a>>:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hey,<br><br>Its come up a few times that it would be cool if we didn't have to<br>depend on the multimedia directory to build Amarok. People always<br>forget to update it/the cmake subdirectory, and there really isn't
<br>much need of using it. I've moved all of our cmake modules to<br>amarok/cmake/modules as a start, but I'd like opinions before possibly<br>changing amarok to build without the multimedia directory. It is an<br>
either/or thing. We either build from multimedia/ or we don't, as far<br>as I can tell there is no way to support both (we set<br>INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES relative to the source path... so they have<br>amarok/ in the path.. )
<br><br>So are there reasons to keep it building from the multimedia directory<br>or should we change it?<br><br>Dan,<br>_______________________________________________<br>Amarok-devel mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Amarok-devel@kde.org">
Amarok-devel@kde.org</a><br><a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel</a><br></blockquote></div><br>