ditching our requirement on the multimedia directory

Dan Meltzer parallelgrapefruit at gmail.com
Thu Mar 15 18:29:59 CET 2007


On 3/15/07, Bart Cerneels <bart.cerneels at gmail.com> wrote:
> Would this break the kdesvn-build script (http://kdesvn-build.kde.org/) ?
> A lot of ppl are using that and might want it to build Amarok to.

This is definatly something to check.  I don't use kdesvn-build so I
am not sure...
>
>  2007/3/15, Dan Meltzer <parallelgrapefruit at gmail.com>:
> >
> > Hey,
> >
> > Its come up a few times that it would be cool if we didn't have to
> > depend on the multimedia directory to build Amarok.  People always
> > forget to update it/the cmake subdirectory, and there really isn't
> > much need of using it.  I've moved all of our cmake modules to
> > amarok/cmake/modules as a start, but I'd like opinions before possibly
> > changing amarok to build without the multimedia directory.  It is an
> > either/or thing.  We either build from multimedia/ or we don't, as far
> > as I can tell there is no way to support both (we set
> > INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES relative to the source path... so they have
> > amarok/ in the path.. )
> >
> > So are there reasons to keep it building from the multimedia directory
> > or should we change it?
> >
> > Dan,
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amarok-devel mailing list
> > Amarok-devel at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok-devel mailing list
> Amarok-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
>
>


More information about the Amarok-devel mailing list