[Uml-devel] 2.0 design consideration

Jonathan Riddell jr at jriddell.org
Sun Feb 23 12:50:02 UTC 2003


On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Mathias Meyer wrote:

> On Sunday 23 February 2003 15:55 Andrew Sutton wrote:
> > so, I'm generating implementations of UML classes, and i remember from
> > a conversation with sebastian that we thought using Qt signals on UML
> > classes was (for some reason) a good idea. So, for example, if an
> > attribute (like the scope kind) of an object changes, the application
> > can react to it. does this sound like something worthwhile to
> > implement?
> >
> It definitely does, since slots&signals are a really great feature of the
> Qt.

Agreed.

> One question though: How is that kind of stuff implemented in
> Umbrello 1.x?

You can't, care to implement it?

Jonathan Riddell






More information about the umbrello-devel mailing list