[Uml-devel] 2.0 design consideration

[Mathias Meyer]

On Sunday 23 February 2003 15:55 Andrew Sutton wrote:
> so, I'm generating implementations of UML classes, and i remember from
> a conversation with sebastian that we thought using Qt signals on UML
> classes was (for some reason) a good idea. So, for example, if an
> attribute (like the scope kind) of an object changes, the application
> can react to it. does this sound like something worthwhile to
> implement?
>
It definitely does, since slots&signals are a really great feature of the 
Qt. One question though: How is that kind of stuff implemented in 
Umbrello 1.x?

Best regards,
Mathias
-- 
"only wimps use backup: _real_ men just upload their important stuff
on ftp, and let the rest of the world mirror it ;)" - linus torvalds