[Uml-devel] news on 2.crap

[Jonathan Riddell]

On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Luis De la Parra Blum wrote:
> On Friday 07 February 2003 20:29, Andrew Sutton wrote:
> >
> > let me see if i got this right...
> >
> > 1.2 head is head on sf for the time being
> > 2.0 would be head on kde
> > eventually, 2.0 becomes head on sf
>
> nop.. it's exactly the other way around! =)
> well.. there is actually no 1.2 branch ( I dont think Jonathan has branched
> and or tagged anything after he tagged head as 1.1.1)
>
> but anyways.. it's not only that there is no "official" 1.2 branch, but that
> all development in the 1.X series is done in KDE now.  (no more commits to
> SF)
>
> What I propose, is head in KDE cvs is for futher development of 1.X series,
> for release with KDE 3.2
> We create a branch "2.0" in KDE where you can import your code, and then we
> all can start working on it as a kind of an "experimental branch".
> When this experimental branch becomes good enough, we tag the last 1.X version
> and drop the new code into head (thous replacing all 1.X code)

Choices are
1) Make a new module in sourceforge CVS and put Andrew's code there
or
2) Branch the KDE CVS and put it there as Luis says above.

I'm happy with either, but tend towards the first for some reason, seems
simpler.

Jonathan Riddell