[Uml-devel] news on 2.crap

[Andrew Sutton]

On Friday 07 February 2003 1:29 pm, Luis De la Parra Blum wrote:
> On Friday 07 February 2003 07:54, Andrew Sutton wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 February 2003 4:45 pm, Sebastian Stein wrote:
> > > Andrew Sutton <ansutton at kent.edu> [030206 22:39]:
> > > > and MOF implementation covers about 130 classes and about 12,000
> > > > lines of code. pending the implementation of about a dozen more
> > > > classes and a
> >
> > i'm kind of familiar. i was going to try and check it all in to the 2.0
> > branch. i'm not entirely sure how to do that, but i'll check it out.
>
> Is this 2.0 thing supposed to be a branch on the project??
> I mean, do you want to start something new, or is it supposed to be the 2.0
> version of Umbrello UML Modeller?
>
> I am asking because if the code is to be the 2.version of Umbrello, then I
> think we should create a 2.0 branch and dump the code there IN THE KDE CVS.
> otherwise we are going to continue 1.2 branch in KDE cvs (for release with
> KDE 3.2) and the 2.0 at SF... then at some point 2.0 is going to be good
> enough that we will want to drop the 1.X series and make 2.0 the head
> branch... wich would mean we loose all cvs history again.

let me see if i got this right...

1.2 head is head on sf for the time being
2.0 would be head on kde
eventually, 2.0 becomes head on sf

i like that idea. then i wouldn't run the risk of forgetting to tag my 
checkins and pollute the 1.x release series. what do i need to do to hook 
that up?

andy