TagLib's future

Ibrahim Sha'ath ibrahimshaath at gmail.com
Thu May 14 14:44:11 UTC 2015


I definitely don't have the time (or sufficient domain knowledge) to really
contribute to TagLib but I'd like to say thank you, Lukáš, for all your
hard work.

--
Ibrahim

On 14 May 2015 at 15:32, Sander Jansen <s.jansen at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Tsuda Kageyu <tsuda.kageyu at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Lukáš,
>>
>> First, thank you for kindly accepting a lot of pull requests of mine.
>>
>> Although I'm willing to take on your burden and repay your kindness, I
>> don't think I'm an appropriate person for reviewing the code, since most
>> changes since v1.9.1 has been made by me. (And I'm the type of individual
>> that doesn't hesitate to make drastic changes as you know.)
>>
>> So I suggest that we release beta versions several times and call for
>> feedback from the users (especially developers of the projects rely on
>> TagLib).
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Kageyu
>>
>> 2015-05-13 8:20 GMT+09:00 Lukáš Lalinský <lalinsky at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Since there are people asking for a new release more and more often and
>>> it seems that I'm not really able to do it, I'd like to discuss TagLib's
>>> future. A few years back Scott asked me to coordinate the 1.6 release and
>>> generally become the maintainer of the project, but since then I have not
>>> worked on many projects that use TagLib and I currently have no direct use
>>> for it myself.
>>>
>>> We have have a long list of pull requests on GitHub, a lot of changes in
>>> master and at least one backward-compatible release pending. I find it very
>>> hard to motivate myself to review pull requests, especially if they are
>>> questionable in some way. This was already showing in the last release,
>>> where I didn't take my time to review all the changes properly and the
>>> result was not very good. I'm afraid that if I try to do this new release,
>>> it will end similarly badly.
>>>
>>> So I'd like to discuss what would be the best way to go forward.
>>>
>>> Lukas
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> taglib-devel mailing list
>>> taglib-devel at kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/taglib-devel
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> taglib-devel mailing list
>> taglib-devel at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/taglib-devel
>>
>>
> I'd be happy to review current master branch changes. Should I use github
> comments to add a reviewed by?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> taglib-devel mailing list
> taglib-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/taglib-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/taglib-devel/attachments/20150514/8f637a70/attachment.html>


More information about the taglib-devel mailing list