s.jansen at gmail.com
Thu May 14 14:32:58 UTC 2015
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Tsuda Kageyu <tsuda.kageyu at gmail.com>
> Hi Lukáš,
> First, thank you for kindly accepting a lot of pull requests of mine.
> Although I'm willing to take on your burden and repay your kindness, I
> don't think I'm an appropriate person for reviewing the code, since most
> changes since v1.9.1 has been made by me. (And I'm the type of individual
> that doesn't hesitate to make drastic changes as you know.)
> So I suggest that we release beta versions several times and call for
> feedback from the users (especially developers of the projects rely on
> 2015-05-13 8:20 GMT+09:00 Lukáš Lalinský <lalinsky at gmail.com>:
>> Hi all,
>> Since there are people asking for a new release more and more often and
>> it seems that I'm not really able to do it, I'd like to discuss TagLib's
>> future. A few years back Scott asked me to coordinate the 1.6 release and
>> generally become the maintainer of the project, but since then I have not
>> worked on many projects that use TagLib and I currently have no direct use
>> for it myself.
>> We have have a long list of pull requests on GitHub, a lot of changes in
>> master and at least one backward-compatible release pending. I find it very
>> hard to motivate myself to review pull requests, especially if they are
>> questionable in some way. This was already showing in the last release,
>> where I didn't take my time to review all the changes properly and the
>> result was not very good. I'm afraid that if I try to do this new release,
>> it will end similarly badly.
>> So I'd like to discuss what would be the best way to go forward.
>> taglib-devel mailing list
>> taglib-devel at kde.org
> taglib-devel mailing list
> taglib-devel at kde.org
I'd be happy to review current master branch changes. Should I use github
comments to add a reviewed by?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the taglib-devel