TagLib's future

[Tsuda Kageyu]

I think it's fine, Sander.
I'm willing to discuss and improve the changes.

2015-05-14 23:44 GMT+09:00 Ibrahim Sha'ath <ibrahimshaath at gmail.com>:

> I definitely don't have the time (or sufficient domain knowledge) to
> really contribute to TagLib but I'd like to say thank you, Lukáš, for all
> your hard work.
>
> --
> Ibrahim
>
> On 14 May 2015 at 15:32, Sander Jansen <s.jansen at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Tsuda Kageyu <tsuda.kageyu at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Lukáš,
>>>
>>> First, thank you for kindly accepting a lot of pull requests of mine.
>>>
>>> Although I'm willing to take on your burden and repay your kindness, I
>>> don't think I'm an appropriate person for reviewing the code, since most
>>> changes since v1.9.1 has been made by me. (And I'm the type of individual
>>> that doesn't hesitate to make drastic changes as you know.)
>>>
>>> So I suggest that we release beta versions several times and call for
>>> feedback from the users (especially developers of the projects rely on
>>> TagLib).
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Kageyu
>>>
>>> 2015-05-13 8:20 GMT+09:00 Lukáš Lalinský <lalinsky at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Since there are people asking for a new release more and more often and
>>>> it seems that I'm not really able to do it, I'd like to discuss TagLib's
>>>> future. A few years back Scott asked me to coordinate the 1.6 release and
>>>> generally become the maintainer of the project, but since then I have not
>>>> worked on many projects that use TagLib and I currently have no direct use
>>>> for it myself.
>>>>
>>>> We have have a long list of pull requests on GitHub, a lot of changes
>>>> in master and at least one backward-compatible release pending. I find it
>>>> very hard to motivate myself to review pull requests, especially if they
>>>> are questionable in some way. This was already showing in the last release,
>>>> where I didn't take my time to review all the changes properly and the
>>>> result was not very good. I'm afraid that if I try to do this new release,
>>>> it will end similarly badly.
>>>>
>>>> So I'd like to discuss what would be the best way to go forward.
>>>>
>>>> Lukas
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> taglib-devel mailing list
>>>> taglib-devel at kde.org
>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/taglib-devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> taglib-devel mailing list
>>> taglib-devel at kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/taglib-devel
>>>
>>>
>> I'd be happy to review current master branch changes. Should I use github
>> comments to add a reviewed by?
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> taglib-devel mailing list
>> taglib-devel at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/taglib-devel
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> taglib-devel mailing list
> taglib-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/taglib-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/taglib-devel/attachments/20150514/5d50b568/attachment.html>