TagLib 1.10 BETA Released

[Robin Stocker]

Rex Dieter wrote:
> Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu>
> > wrote:
> > 
> >> One small nitpick, should internal
> >> TAGLIB_LIB_VERSION_STRING (1.10.0) be expected to match the
> >> tarball
> >> (1.10)
> >> version ?  If so, they currently do not.
> >>
> > 
> > I didn't have that as a goal, but I see no reason why not remove
> > the .0
> > from the string.
> 
> I'd personally prefer consistency that the last digit always be
> included
> (why treat 1.10.0 differently than say 1.10.1) ?

+1, that's also what Semantic Versioning uses (which many projects
have adopted):

http://semver.org/

Regards,
  Robin