TagLib 1.10 BETA Released

[Rex Dieter]

Lukáš Lalinský wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> wrote:
> 
>> One small nitpick, should internal
>> TAGLIB_LIB_VERSION_STRING (1.10.0) be expected to match the tarball
>> (1.10)
>> version ?  If so, they currently do not.
>>
> 
> I didn't have that as a goal, but I see no reason why not remove the .0
> from the string.

I'd personally prefer consistency that the last digit always be included 
(why treat 1.10.0 differently than say 1.10.1) ?

-- Rex