TagLib 1.10 BETA Released

[Tony Pombo]

I don't like 1.10, because mathematically 1.10 < 1.9

Had the existing versions been 1.01 ... 1.09, then 1.1[0] makes sense, but too late.

I guess the only next logical version is 1.91 or 2.0

On Aug 30, 2015 1:59 AM, Robin Stocker <robin at nibor.org> wrote:
>
> Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu>
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > >> One small nitpick, should internal
> > >> TAGLIB_LIB_VERSION_STRING (1.10.0) be expected to match the
> > >> tarball
> > >> (1.10)
> > >> version ?  If so, they currently do not.
> > >>
> > > 
> > > I didn't have that as a goal, but I see no reason why not remove
> > > the .0
> > > from the string.
> > 
> > I'd personally prefer consistency that the last digit always be
> > included
> > (why treat 1.10.0 differently than say 1.10.1) ?
>
> +1, that's also what Semantic Versioning uses (which many projects
> have adopted):
>
> http://semver.org/
>
> Regards,
>   Robin
> _______________________________________________
> taglib-devel mailing list
> taglib-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/taglib-devel