Output in console is a mess

Wed Nov 9 08:43:13 UTC 2016

Hi, 
Thanks for your comments and suggestions, and sorry for the typos /
ambiguities of the original email, it was written a bit hastily.Now, to
your comments:
> is that a typo? do you mean ubuntu 16.10? there is no more support
> for 10.10 
> for many years now.

Yes, indeed I'm on Ubuntu 16.10 (on a macbookpro 11.1, 64bit platform),
using RKward version 0.6.S with KDE development platform version
4.14.22 and R version 3.3.1. here the output of rk.sessionInfo():
-- Frontend --RKWard version: 0.6.5KDE version (runtime): 4.14.22KDE
version (compile time): 4.14.16Qt build key: x86_64 linux g++-4 full-
configLocal KDE directory: /home/dp/.kde/RKWard storage directory:
/home/dp/.rkward/Backend version (as known to the frontend): 3.3.1
Debug message file (this may contain relevant diagnostic output in case
of trouble):/tmp/rkward.frontend.n14793
-- Backend --Debug message file (this may contain relevant diagnostic
output in case of trouble):/tmp/rkward.rbackend.J14803
R version (compile time): 3.2.5  (2016-04-14 r70478)R runtime session
info:R version 3.3.1 (2016-06-21)Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-
bit)Running under: Ubuntu 16.10
> can you give a specific example (R code)? i've never had any issues
> with the 
> consle output, it looks just like any other R console, except for
> extra syntax 
> highlighting etc.

This is how it looks, as you can see, all cells in the table appeared
to be centered, and the headers don't align with the content:

$ANOVA
                       Effect DFn
DFd          SSn       SSd            F            p p<.05          ges
1                 (Intercept)   1  37 1.129608e+03 52.509349
795.96312517 1.271775e-26     * 8.976219e-01
2                         Factor1   1  37 5.761039e-
01  6.389868   3.33588203 7.586116e-02       4.451656e-03
3                  Factor2   2  74 8.392979e+00 22.912678  13.55320464
9.655221e-06     * 6.115982e-02
4                Factor3   1  37 4.515638e-01  8.675797   1.92580116
1.735198e-01       3.492674e-03
5              Factor1:Factor2   2  74 1.406914e+00
10.762772   4.83665417 1.061346e-02     * 1.080212e-02
6            Factor1:Factor3   1  37 2.873569e-
02  5.083440   0.20915372 6.501056e-01       2.229888e-04
7     Factor2:Factor2   2  74 5.290215e-03 13.770043   0.01421477
9.858885e-01       4.105953e-05
8 Factor1:Factor2:Factor3   2  74 7.797428e-02  8.733342   0.33034873
7.197274e-01       6.048491e-04

> > - Output tables only occupy half of the console space, and making
> > the
> > output unnecessarily long and impossible to work out for dataframes
> > with more than 5 - 6 columns.

That indeed fixed that problem.
> > - Tweaking the color scheme of the editor, I made the huge mistake
> > of
> > inadvertedly pressing the " use KDE colors", and now all color
> > schemas
> > are exactly the same.
> 
> if that is the case, this is more likely a bug in kate (katepart),
> the editor 
> we're using in RKWard.
> 
> > There was no way to re-set the color schemas.
> > Removing and re-installing rkward didn't do anything, nor removing
> > configuration files or editing them to re=set the colors. The only
> > alternative was to completely reinstall KDE.
> 
> are you suggesting that a user specific configuration changed
> settings system 
> wide for all users? that would be a major flaw. but like i said, we
> didn't 
> invent an editor ourselves but are embedding katepart, so there's not
> too much 
> we can tell you about this.

I don't know how far the change went, or if it affect other users
(there aren't any, I'm the only one using this computer, and is an
local installation). And since finally got it working again, I'm, not
going to fiddle with it anymore.
Thanks!Daniel

On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 20:20 +0100, meik michalke wrote:
> hi daniel,
> 
> thanks for your interest in using RKWard! first things first: it
> appears you 
> are not subscribed to this list -- you might lose replies because
> they usually 
> only go to the list. you might like to subscribe for the time being.
> 
> Am Dienstag, 8. November 2016, 20:02:04 CET schrieb Daniel P.:
> > I have been working with R for a while, and recently I moved to
> > Ubuntu10.10 and installed Rkward.
> 
> is that a typo? do you mean ubuntu 16.10? there is no more support
> for 10.10 
> for many years now.
> 
> could you please give us some more info on your system (ideally the
> output of 
> rk.sessionInfo(), at least version numbers of KDE, R and RKWard)?
> 
> > - The output is a mess.
> 
> can you give a specific example (R code)? i've never had any issues
> with the 
> consle output, it looks just like any other R console, except for
> extra syntax 
> highlighting etc.
> 
> > - Output tables only occupy half of the console space, and making
> > the
> > output unnecessarily long and impossible to work out for dataframes
> > with more than 5 - 6 columns.
> 
> you can customize the width of the output in settings -> configure
> RKWard -> R 
> backend.
> 
> > - Tweaking the color scheme of the editor, I made the huge mistake
> > of
> > inadvertedly pressing the " use KDE colors", and now all color
> > schemas
> > are exactly the same.
> 
> if that is the case, this is more likely a bug in kate (katepart),
> the editor 
> we're using in RKWard.
> 
> > There was no way to re-set the color schemas.
> > Removing and re-installing rkward didn't do anything, nor removing
> > configuration files or editing them to re=set the colors. The only
> > alternative was to completely reinstall KDE.
> 
> are you suggesting that a user specific configuration changed
> settings system 
> wide for all users? that would be a major flaw. but like i said, we
> didn't 
> invent an editor ourselves but are embedding katepart, so there's not
> too much 
> we can tell you about this.
> 
> 
> viele grüße :: m.eik
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rkward-users/attachments/20161109/33550e47/attachment.html>