[rkward-cvs] SF.net SVN: rkward:[3648] branches/jss_dec_10/FINAL_JSS_TEX/FINAL_splitted

tfry at users.sourceforge.net tfry at users.sourceforge.net
Sun May 29 08:14:13 UTC 2011

Revision: 3648
Author:   tfry
Date:     2011-05-29 08:14:12 +0000 (Sun, 29 May 2011)

Log Message:
Add a comment. Highlighting.

Modified Paths:

Modified: branches/jss_dec_10/FINAL_JSS_TEX/FINAL_splitted/GUI_elements.tex
--- branches/jss_dec_10/FINAL_JSS_TEX/FINAL_splitted/GUI_elements.tex	2011-05-28 20:36:41 UTC (rev 3647)
+++ branches/jss_dec_10/FINAL_JSS_TEX/FINAL_splitted/GUI_elements.tex	2011-05-29 08:14:12 UTC (rev 3648)
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
 Additionally, several tool windows are available form resizable sub-panes at the four sides\footnote{
     This combination of a tabbed-document interface and sub-panes is sometimes referred to as an ``IDE-style'' interface, due to its
-    usage in popular IDEs such as Eclipse \citep{Eclipse} or KDevelop \citep{KDevelop}.
+    usage in popular IDEs such as \pkg{Eclipse} \citep{Eclipse} or \pkg{KDevelop} \citep{KDevelop}.
 }. By default, the
 left panel (Figure~\ref{fig:main_window}B) contains a file browser (see Section~\ref{sec:further_tool_windows}) and a
 workspace browser (see Section~\ref{sec:workspace_browser_object_viewer}), the

Modified: branches/jss_dec_10/FINAL_JSS_TEX/FINAL_splitted/TODO
--- branches/jss_dec_10/FINAL_JSS_TEX/FINAL_splitted/TODO	2011-05-28 20:36:41 UTC (rev 3647)
+++ branches/jss_dec_10/FINAL_JSS_TEX/FINAL_splitted/TODO	2011-05-29 08:14:12 UTC (rev 3648)
@@ -27,6 +27,10 @@
 * In our paper we claimed that RKWard is aimed as productive too. We added citations, including one of the first author, from peer-review literature which specifically cite the usage of RKWard during their research work as support for our claim that RKWard's purpose is the usage as a productive tool.
 * We updated the example script (demo.R) to reflect the changes requested by the reviewers. We also added a reference for reader to the zip-archive containing all scripts and data used in the paper. 
+  - TF: I wonder whether that really makes sense, as including examples is really standard in JStatSoft. I checked some other recent articles, and those
+    do not seem to mention the examples, specifically.
+    Besides, in our case, I think that having the code examples is comparatively pointless (except perhaps for the example plugin), since most of
+    that is simply to show off GUI features, not produce anything.
 Issues raised by the reviewers

This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development platform, the world's largest Open Source development site.

More information about the rkward-tracker mailing list