Review Request 125544: Fix limit/offset handling when sort option is no sort.

[Vishesh Handa]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125544/#review86564
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Awesome work. Thanks a lot for taking care of this.

- Vishesh Handa


On Oct. 9, 2015, 5:54 p.m., Xuetian Weng wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125544/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 9, 2015, 5:54 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Baloo, Release Team and Vishesh Handa.
> 
> 
> Repository: baloo
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The bug is obvious, old code uses limit instead of (limit > 0), which gracefully handles limit < 0 case (means everything).
> 
> After offset is introduced, limit < 0 case is not handled properly.
> 
> This patch contains following changes:
> 1. make offset uint, m_offset is uint in Query already.
> 2. handle limit < 0 case properly.
> 
> Also fix offset with sorting.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/lib/searchstore.h 17b4263 
>   src/lib/searchstore.cpp a2e7749 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125544/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> baloosearch:/ doesn't return anything because of this, now it properly returns result.
> 
> Play with baloosearch command a little bit, offset and limit returns the [offset, offset + limit) and no crash on the border case.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Xuetian Weng
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/attachments/20151009/02445abc/attachment-0001.html>