Michael Pyne mpyne at
Sun Oct 12 23:04:54 UTC 2014

On Sun, October 12, 2014 00:30:43 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > once after CHANGELOG:
> I'm not against an empty CHANGELOG: meaning the tool has to use the title,
> but i'd still want to have the possibility to have a separate line, my
> titles are usually "more geeky" and I would not want them in a public
> consumption changelog so i'd have to craft something more user-friendly in
> the CHANGELOG: entry.
> What do others think?

I think allowing CHANGELOG: to have a more descriptive title, while falling 
back to the commit title if CHANGELOG: is left blank, makes perfect sense and 
is a good idea.

 - Michael Pyne

More information about the release-team mailing list