sebas at kde.org
Mon Oct 13 09:04:52 UTC 2014
On Sunday, October 12, 2014 19:04:54 Michael Pyne wrote:
> On Sun, October 12, 2014 00:30:43 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > once after CHANGELOG:
> > I'm not against an empty CHANGELOG: meaning the tool has to use the title,
> > but i'd still want to have the possibility to have a separate line, my
> > titles are usually "more geeky" and I would not want them in a public
> > consumption changelog so i'd have to craft something more user-friendly in
> > the CHANGELOG: entry.
> > What do others think?
> I think allowing CHANGELOG: to have a more descriptive title, while falling
> back to the commit title if CHANGELOG: is left blank, makes perfect sense
> and is a good idea.
Was thinking the same. It feels silly having to repeat a perfectly crafted
commit message/title, but that's not always very clear to end-users (which the
changelog is really for). I like that fallback solution.
http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
More information about the release-team