[Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

[Laszlo Papp]

On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Albert Astals Cid <aacid at kde.org> wrote:

> El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 00:03:38, Luigi Toscano va
> escriure:
> > Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > El Diumenge, 16 de desembre de 2012, a les 23:53:23, Antonis
> Tsiapaliokas
> > > va>
> > > escriure:
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >>> Attached, can somebody give it a try ?
> > >>>
> > >>> Alex
> > >>
> > >> I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work.
> > >> With the 2.8.9 cmake, the issues is solved, without the attached patch
> > >> needed.
> > >
> > > So let's go for the cmake increase?
> > >
> > > Anyone against it? (I will need an answer before RC1 tag on tuesday
> night)
>

I am all for it.

On a side note, I have never understood the objection against 2.8.9 before
as that is what was also required for framework. Hence, it would somewhat
lower the barrier for the framework contribution, too.

IIRC, one of the main issues was the debian way, but it does not seem the
case anymore:
http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=names&keywords=cmake

Laszlo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/attachments/20121216/cd3c097e/attachment.html>