[Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master
Albert Astals Cid
aacid at kde.org
Sun Dec 16 23:07:04 UTC 2012
El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 00:03:38, Luigi Toscano va escriure:
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El Diumenge, 16 de desembre de 2012, a les 23:53:23, Antonis Tsiapaliokas
> > va>
> > escriure:
> >> Hello,
> >>> Attached, can somebody give it a try ?
> >>> Alex
> >> I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work.
> >> With the 2.8.9 cmake, the issues is solved, without the attached patch
> >> needed.
> > So let's go for the cmake increase?
> > Anyone against it? (I will need an answer before RC1 tag on tuesday night)
> I know I'm not helping, and maybe it was already discussed again so please
> disregard this in case, but wasn't there a long and heated discussion about
> this whose result was to go with 2.8.8 for kdelibs 4.10? And kdepimlibs is
> considered "part" of kdelibs afaik.
Yes, there was a huge discussion, but if you can't make it work with 2.8.8,
what's the point of requiring it and not 2.8.9?
More information about the release-team