BIC in libkonq

[Modestas Vainius]

Hello,

On trečiadienis 04 Rugpjūtis 2010 12:31:27 Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > Anyway, at this point I see this as completely lost battle. I guess we
> > will need to start adding distro patches (sad) for bumping sonames of
> > those public libraries because you do not seem to have much interest in
> > following well defined practises in the unix world which are supported
> > by
> > libc/ldconfig/ld.so.conf.
> 
>  And they seem to be quite good excuses for you too, it seems. If you want
> this problem solved, kde-core-devel is a much better place for the
> discussion then the release-team list at the point when the tarballs are
> about to be released. You apparently have known for quite some time, so
> yours "you" is actually "we".

s/libsolidinterfaces/libnepomukquery/ in my previous mail.

Similar topics have been on k-c-d before [1][2], but POV of "Laziness and 
unawareness are pretty good excuses for many things." simply prevails. 
libnepomukquery is a pretty good example of that. People simply don't consider 
this important enough.

In this case, our arguments were apparently discarded because "making an 
exception for libkonq doesn't make that much sense". I admit it may be a bit 
late as we do not package pre-releases nowadays (which may be our fault but 
that's the way it is for now). Therefore, I cannot be in supervisor position 
for these things until it is "too late" nor anybody would listen to me.

[1] http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=124061169122689&w=2
[2] http://www.mail-archive.com/release-team@kde.org/msg02970.html

-- 
Modestas Vainius <modestas at vainius.eu>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/attachments/20100804/25df3aee/attachment.sig