kdesupport rearrangement

[David Faure]

On Monday 29 September 2008, Benoit Jacob wrote:
> If we remove /trunk/kdesupport, then we can use the name
> kdesupport-for-trunk without any risk of confusion.

I don't think we want to do that. People working on kdesupport (or fixing
the occasional bug) expect it to be in trunk/kdesupport, it's the logical place for it.

> Also, why couldn't we have /trunk/kdesupport-for-4.1etc. in parallel
> with these tags ?

Well not in parallel with "stable" ;-)

> I propose:
> 
> tags/kdesupport-devel
> tags/kdesupport-for-trunk (what we called kdesupport-stable)
> tags/kdesupport-for-4.1
> tags/kdesupport-for-4.2
> etc...
> 
> what do you think?

The first two don't make sense to me. If you mean that people should work
in the code in one of them, then tags/ is really wrong.

> Maybe we also want to put all these in a single tags/kdesupport/
> directory, I don't know.

Most people (or kdesvn-build) will only check out one of them, two at most,
so it doesn't really matter IMHO.

-- 
David Faure, faure at kde.org, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE,
Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).