Pre-approved Languages

Andreas Pakulat apaku at
Sun Mar 30 15:28:26 CEST 2008

On 30.03.08 08:19:33, Allen Winter wrote:
> Howdy,
> So we seem to have reached consensus on a policy (enclosed below).
> Now I think we should take on the task of pre-approving a couple
> of non-C++ languages,  thereby giving the green light to anyone
> thinking about using one of them => Chicken Lays Egg.
> Nominations anyone?

I'm not a kdebindings person, but I did try both korundum (ruby) and
I know PyQt/PyKDE for quite some time.

Both have one drawback:

- PyQt/PyKDE are both mostly developed in private repositories of one
  person (well, one for each), which means that fixes sometimes take a
  bit longer and (especially PyQt4) don't follow our release cycles
- Korundum4 lacks documentation and examples (the latter exist, but are
  still for KDE3 version)

But even though both bindings are in quite good shape - AFAIK and both
languages should be pre-approved.


Blow it out your ear.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : 

More information about the release-team mailing list