Fwd: [Kde-pim] Request to exclude KMail from the KDE 4.0 release

[Sebastian Kuegler]

On Friday 07 December 2007 00:49:08 Allen Winter wrote:
> Yes, KMail is really as bad as indicated in the enclosed message.
> And so are many of the KDEPIM apps.

That matches what Mirko of KDAB told me. He also said that it should be fine 
by April.

One question (therefore CC: Thiago), what is affected by the missing SSL 
support? Or did that arrive in the meantime?

> Only KAlarm, KTimeTracker (formerly KArm) and a few other support tools
> will be ready for release.  I can't see KMail, KNode, Akregator, Kontact or
> KPilot being ready .. unless we have a Christmas Miracle.  Maybe KOrganizer
> will be ready.
>
> David Jarvie, Thomas and I are the only ones putting any real time into
> KDEPIM. But, alas, we failed to make much progress with such a huge module.
>
> I tried my best.
>
> Anyway... how to proceed?  Simply leave out the kdepim -4.0.0 tarball?

Yes. Bad luck, but PIM3 works fine in the meantime.
-- 
sebas

 http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org |  GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 481 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/attachments/20071207/e9a43a78/attachment.pgp