[rekonq] [ANNOUNCE] rekonq 0.6 stable release

lindsay.mathieson at gmail.com lindsay.mathieson at gmail.com
Tue Sep 14 03:07:04 CEST 2010




On Tuesday 14/09/2010 at 10:33 am, benjamin.poulain at nokia.com wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 06:45:06 am benjamin.poulain at nokia.com wrote:
>>>
>>> The disadvantages is that we no longer have native widgets. So we can 
>>> have
>>> problems with stuff like contextual menu and modal dialog which we 
>>> should
>>> be careful with.
>>
>> That's a honking *big* disadvantage from my point of view. And very 
>> little (ie
>> none) of my web browsing needs accelerated 3D.
>
> Hum, I was not clear apparently.
> I  am not saying contextual menu/modal dialog are not possible. I am 
> just saying developers might need to make them modal to the window, 
> and no longer to the web view...

I took it to mean there would no longer be native controls (buttons, 
edit boxes etc) in web pages which I would see as a negative - one of 
the  main reasons for  rekonq over firefox is its integration and 
native look and feel.




--
Lindsay Mathieson
http://blackpaw.jalbum.net/home/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rekonq/attachments/20100914/d26ba517/attachment.htm 


More information about the rekonq mailing list