[rekonq] Fwd: Re: Review Request: Optimize rekonq protocol handling

[andrea diamantini]

(Sorry Lionel, clicked the wrong button...)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: andrea diamantini <adjam7 at gmail.com>
Date: 2010/10/20
Subject: Re: [rekonq] Re: Review Request: Optimize rekonq protocol handling
To: Lionel Chauvin <megabigbug at yahoo.fr>


Yes, the motivation for this is just because I consider them more readable.
But in general, considering that people is used on Qt/KDE conventions
(converging on brackets), I'm not too strict on.
To fix code style, we have a script in the scripts dir.

2010/10/20 Lionel Chauvin <megabigbug at yahoo.fr>

Le mercredi 20 octobre 2010 00:32:41, Pierre Rossi a écrit :
> > Is there a good reason for this "fragmentation" in the coding style ?
>
> Like Andrea, I prefer curly braces on a new line because they are
> horizontally
> aligned with the right curly braces => more readable.
>
> Why the qt coding style is not consistent ?
> Why "if" doesn't use the same rule as classes and functions ? I assume this
> is
> because it uses more lines and we write more "if" than classes.
>
> Lionel Chauvin
> _______________________________________________
> rekonq mailing list
> rekonq at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rekonq/attachments/20101020/e0ab7b82/attachment.htm